Moral relativism is the belief that moral principles are not universal or objective, but rather dependent on cultural, societal, or individual perspectives. Proponents of moral relativism argue that what is considered right or wrong can vary across different cultures or time periods. One common example used to illustrate moral relativism is the practice of cannibalism. In some cultures, consuming human flesh is seen as a sacred ritual or a form of tribute to deceased loved ones. However, in Western societies, cannibalism is universally condemned as a barbaric and abhorrent act. Critics of moral relativism argue that it leads to a lack of moral accountability and can justify heinous acts under the guise of cultural differences. They contend that there are certain moral principles, such as the prohibition of murder or theft, that should be universally upheld regardless of cultural or societal norms. Overall, the concept of moral relativism raises important questions about the nature of morality and the extent to which ethical principles are subjective or objective. It challenges us to critically examine our own beliefs and cultural biases when evaluating ethical issues.